Technology in the Classroom

     In Marc Prensky’s article “Listen to the Natives,” he gives a vivid depiction of the difference between children growing up in this day and age and those of us who are from the 20th century. He calls us “digital immigrants” since we have come into the 21st century from the outside. Our students are termed “digital natives.” They know a language and in some ways a culture that is to us learned. How shall we then educate?

     One way to bridge this gap is to pay attention to what our students’ interests are.  Ask for their insights based on those interests.  Even if this means that they will talk about technology that we are unfamiliar with—if they are making connections, they are learning. 

 

     Collaborating with students is essential.  Education is a like a triangle between the student, the teacher, and the parent.  It takes all three to be effective.  However, keep in mind that there is an authority structure.  The student does not get to decide what is taught.  

     Engagement and motivation are essential to the learning environment.  Learning cannot be forced upon someone; it must be intrinsic.  While it is a must for our students to be engaged, we must be cautious on what they are engaged in.  Just because students are fully absorbed with technology does not mean they are learning useful things.  It also does not mean that they are not engaged in education.  Our lazy hearts pull us to what is easy and fun.  We must push ourselves and our students to do and be more.  Learning does take effort.

     Technology must be used for the tool that it is.  One of the reasons why there is more “technology” used in after-school programs than during school is that much of the educational software out there is in game format that is meant for individuals having fun playing.  Many of the games spend much more time on the game part and not much education is imparted.  Also, many of the games are meant to enhance skills that have been taught in the classroom.  They are not built for the teacher in the classroom.

     The end of the article gives away the author’s leaning.  He is saying that the students are the customers and that parents and teachers do not know what the students’ needs are.  A more accurate view is that education is a duty that rests with parents.  They are entrusted with their children’s education.  They may choose to delegate this authority to schools.  The purpose of education is not to entertain. 

      That being said, the author’s core intention is correct.  Students must be engaged in their education or else learning has not actually taken place.  The excellent educator uses whatever tools possible to ensure that growth is happening.

To read article, click here:  http://www.siprep.org/prodev/documents/Prensky.pdf